CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – FRANCE – SUDDEN BREACH OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS – ASSOCIATION – INAPPLICATION OF ARTICLE L 442-6I 5 °COM. CODE

Commercial relationships: The French Supreme Court clarifies the applicability to an association of the commercial relationship within the meaning of Article L. 442-6, I, 5 ° (Rubis / GMPA et Allianz Vie)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The somewhat tangled facts of this case will lead the Court of Cassation to issue a ruling of principle that is promised to be published. The Rubis company had contracted with the insurance company Allianz vie, a credit institution and the association Groupement de prévoyance des armées (GMPA). Rubis had contracted to act as an agent by distributing financial products to the members of GMPA. Following the takeover of the credit institution, a new agreement was concluded between Rubis and the association as well as two credit institutions. Noting a reduction and then the disappearance of its turnover, Rubis brought an action for compensation for the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Commercial relationships: The French Supreme Court clarifies the applicability to an association of the commercial relationship within the meaning of Article L. 442-6, I, 5 ° (Rubis / GMPA et Allianz Vie) , 25 January 2017, Concurrences N° 2-2017, Art. N° 83858, pp. 117-118

Visites 169

All reviews