ALERT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - SIGNFICANT IMBALANCE - APPEAL - INTERIM PROCEEDINGS

Interim proceedings: The Paris court of appeal rules that invoking the rules on signficant imbalance may constitute a serious challenge that must be appreciated by a trial judge (Team Interim/Vinci)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. There's no doubt that thejudgment handed down by the Paris Court of Appeal on February 22, 2017, in a case opposing a temporary employment agency to a company claiming in summary proceedings before the Commercial Court of Nanterre, the payment of several invoices will hold the interest of practitioners beyond competition law specialists. The defendant debtor had invoked, as a defence, a serious dispute relating to the existence of a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties within the meaning of Article L. 442-6-I-2° of the Commercial Code, resulting

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Interim proceedings: The Paris court of appeal rules that invoking the rules on signficant imbalance may constitute a serious challenge that must be appreciated by a trial judge (Team Interim/Vinci), 22 February 2017, Concurrences N° 2-2017, Art. N° 84040, www.concurrences.com

Visites 210

All reviews