CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES – ANNULMENT OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION – CONSTITUENT ELEMENTS OF THE INFRINGEMENT

Unlimited jurisdiction: The Court of Justice of the European Union finds that the General Court’s unlimited jurisdiction is strictly limited to the fine and does not extend to the constituent elements of the infringement (Galp Energía Espana)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Again, this case raises the question of the scope of the Court's review of the Commission's competition decisions (in particular, CJEU, 10 July 2014, Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission, Case C-295/12 P ; Concurrences No 4-2014, p. 204). In the present case, the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Alexandre Lacresse, Unlimited jurisdiction: The Court of Justice of the European Union finds that the General Court’s unlimited jurisdiction is strictly limited to the fine and does not extend to the constituent elements of the infringement (Galp Energía Espana), 21 January 2016, Concurrences N° 2-2016, Art. N° 79523, pp. 171-172

Visites 438

All reviews