CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – PROPER NOTICE OF TERMINATION – INFLUENCE – CONVERSION

Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal considers that successful conversion has to be taken in account to appreciate the proper notice of termination (Cargo Lines / Carotrans international)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Practitioners familiar with the litigation of abrupt terminations will not fail to appreciate the originality of this decision of the Paris Court of Appeal "discovered" by our colleague Cyril Grimaldi (JCP G 2016, 288), which runs counter to the current case law of the Court of Cassation on a technical issue, admittedly, but whose implications are both practical and theoretical: the question of determining the length of sufficient notice. Facts and procedure In the present case, two companies, Carotrans and Cargo Lines, acted as freight forwarders for each other. Their relationship, which had lasted since 1995, was consolidated in 2008 by the conclusion

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Aix-Marseille

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal considers that successful conversion has to be taken in account to appreciate the proper notice of termination (Cargo Lines / Carotrans international), 28 January 2016, Concurrences N° 2-2016, Art. N° 79252, p. 131

Visites 199

All reviews