Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal considers that a decline in order of a third within two years motivated by economic conjuncture cannot be deemed as a sudden termination of commercial relationships (Abbax France / Sullair Europe)

Mitchell, Mary-Claude

Previous article Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court considers that without proofs and if it can be objectively justified, a termination of commercial relationships can make a referral to the Competition Authority non receivable (E-Kanopi) Next article Non-competition clauses: The French Supreme Court approves the trial court to have considered that a franchisor could change the sign of its network without abuse and require the execution of a non-competition clause yet not covered by the exemption regulation (vertical agreements), but proportionate to the franchisor’s interest in preserving the existing network (International Esthétique)

CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – ORDER DECLINE – CONJONCTURE ECONOMIQUE – SUDDEN TERMINATION (NO)

14 Jan 2016

Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal considers that a decline in order of a third within two years motivated by economic conjuncture cannot be deemed as a sudden termination of commercial relationships (Abbax France / Sullair Europe)

KEYWORDS

Reference

CA Paris, 14 janv. 2016, Abbax France / Sullair Europe, RG n° 14/16799

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Author

Mary-Claude Mitchell
WM LAW (Paris)

France 88 contributions 126847 visits

Quotation

Mary-Claude Mitchell, Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal considers that a decline in order of a third within two years motivated by economic conjuncture cannot be deemed as a sudden termination of commercial relationships (Abbax France / Sullair Europe), 14 January 2016, Concurrences N° 2-2016, Art. N° 79244, p. 133

Visites 349