CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – JUSTIFICATION – ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION – COMPLAINT – REJECT

Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court considers that without proofs and if it can be objectively justified, a termination of commercial relationships can make a referral to the Competition Authority non receivable (E-Kanopi)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Cass com. 19 janv. 2016, E-Kanopi, n° 14-21670 14-21671

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court considers that without proofs and if it can be objectively justified, a termination of commercial relationships can make a referral to the Competition Authority non receivable (E-Kanopi), 19 January 2016, Concurrences N° 2-2016, Art. N° 79242, p. 133

Visites 2694

All reviews