CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – FRANCHISE – SIGN MODIFICATION – ABUSE (NO) – EXEMPTION REGULATION – PROPORTIONNALITY

Non-competition clauses: The French Supreme Court approves the trial court to have considered that a franchisor could change the sign of its network without abuse and require the execution of a non-competition clause yet not covered by the exemption regulation (vertical agreements), but proportionate to the franchisor’s interest in preserving the existing network (International Esthétique)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Cass. com 19 janv. 2016, International Esthétique, n° 14-16.272

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The company International Esthétique operated a franchise network under the Epil center banner. The contracts contained a clause prohibiting the creation of a competing

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Non-competition clauses: The French Supreme Court approves the trial court to have considered that a franchisor could change the sign of its network without abuse and require the execution of a non-competition clause yet not covered by the exemption regulation (vertical agreements), but proportionate to the franchisor’s interest in preserving the existing network (International Esthétique), 19 January 2016, Concurrences N° 2-2016, Art. N° 79246, p. 133

Visites 179

All reviews