CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - UNFAIR TERMINATION ¬– SUCCESSION OF CONTRACTORS – DURATION OF THE RELATION

Unfair termination: The Paris Court of Appeal rules on the determination of unique business relation and of required period notice in case of succession of contractors (Vivien Fret)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 13 February 2014, No. 12/09668, Vivien Fret c/ Poitou Boissons Although Article L. 442-6-I-5° of the Commercial Code clearly requires that the termination of an established commercial relationship must be effected by giving prior notice "taking into account the duration of the relationship", the question arises as to the duration of the relationship in the event that different contracting parties have succeeded each other over time. Is it necessary to distinguish as many relationships as there are successive partners,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Unfair termination: The Paris Court of Appeal rules on the determination of unique business relation and of required period notice in case of succession of contractors (Vivien Fret) , 13 February 2014, Concurrences N° 2-2014, Art. N° 65789, p. 124

Visites 160

All reviews