CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - COMPETITOR AS EFFICIENT TEST

38.Preliminary question: The Court of Justice of the European Union is to deal with a preliminary question related to the meaning of the competitor as efficient criterion

KEYWORDS
Reference

Sø- og Handelsretten (Danemark), 16 janvier 2014, Post Danmark / Konkurrencerådet, JO C 78 du 15.03.2014 p. 5

La Cour est saisie de plusieurs questions d’interprétation de l’article 102 au regard de la communication de la Commission sur les abus exclusion. La première question porte sur les conditions auxquelles des rabais déterminés en fonction de volumes d’achat sont abusifs. La

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Université Catholique de Louvain
    Belgium 94 articles 125887 visits

Quotation

Anne-Lise Sibony, 38.Preliminary question: The Court of Justice of the European Union is to deal with a preliminary question related to the meaning of the competitor as efficient criterion, 16 January 2014, Concurrences Review N° 2-2014, Art. N° 65692, p. 105

Visites 141

See updates for:

All reviews