CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURE – STATE AIDS – ADMISSIBILITY – SUBSTANTIAL AFFECTATION OF MARKET POSITION

State aids: The General Court declares inadmissible the action of a competitor due to lack of evidence of its market position being substantially affected by the aid (UOP)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Trib. EU, 7 March 2013, UOP v. Commission, Case T-198/09 The IFP is a French non-profit organization for research in the hydrocarbons sector. It has benefited from public support measures which do not qualify as State aid because of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Pascal Cardonnel, State aids: The General Court declares inadmissible the action of a competitor due to lack of evidence of its market position being substantially affected by the aid (UOP), May 2013, Concurrences N° 2-2013, Art. N° 52043, p. 146

Visites 134

All reviews