CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT – AGREEMENT – COMPETITOR OPERATING UNLAWFULLY ON THE MARKET

Competitor operating unlawfully on the market: The Court of Justice rules that EU cartel rules should apply even if the intended target of a prohibited agreement allegedly operated unlawfully on the market (Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky/Slovenská sporitel’ňa)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CJEU, 7 February 2013, Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky v Slovenská sporitel 'ňa, Case C-68/12 Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Union by the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic) for a preliminary ruling on the substance of the question whether the conduct of three Slovak banks, in relation to a non-bank institution (Akcenta CZ a.s.) providing services consisting of cashless exchange transactions through current accounts opened in those banks in order to carry out its activities, fell within the scope of Article 101(1) TFEU and, if so, within the scope of Article 101(3) TFEU. First of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Competitor operating unlawfully on the market: The Court of Justice rules that EU cartel rules should apply even if the intended target of a prohibited agreement allegedly operated unlawfully on the market (Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky/Slovenská sporitel’ňa), May 2013, Concurrences N° 2-2013, Art. N° 52247, p. 65

Visites 172

All reviews