CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ARTICLE 101 TFEU – CARTELS – EVIDENCE – PARENTAL LIABILITY – FINES – NEW GUIDELINES – MARKET FOR CHLOROPRENE RUBBER – MANUFACTURE OF SYNTHETIC RUBBER IN PRIMARY FORMS

Parental liability – Fines: The General Court states that a distinction shall be made between the concept of economical autonomy of a full-function joint venture and the concept of autonomy as regards the adoption of its strategic decisions (EI DuPont de Nemours, Dow Chemical)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. GCEU, 2 February 2012, EI du Pont de Nemours a.o. v. Commission, Case T-76/08, "Market for chloroprene rubber". GCEU, 2 February 2012, Dow Chemical v. Commission, Case T-77/08, "Market for chloroprene rubber". On 2 February 2008, the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered two judgments in Cases T-76/08 and T-77/08, brought by several applicants seeking, principally, the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007)5910 final of 5 December 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case T-77/08). COMP/38629 - Chloroprene Rubber) and, in the alternative, an application for reduction of the amount

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Parental liability – Fines: The General Court states that a distinction shall be made between the concept of economical autonomy of a full-function joint venture and the concept of autonomy as regards the adoption of its strategic decisions (EI DuPont de Nemours, Dow Chemical), 2 February 2012, Concurrences N° 2-2012, Art. N° 45831, pp. 48-50

Visites 319

All reviews