CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – LOYALTY OF PROOF – DEFENSE RIGHTS – PHONE RECORDINGS – FAIR TRIAL – TIME LIMIT – DISTRIBUTION

Loyalty of proof: The Paris Court of Appeal considers phone recordings to be illegal evidence in the TVHA case and refers the case back to the French NCA for further investigations after ruling that the time limit of ten years is not applicable (Philips France)

KEYWORDS
Reference

CA Paris, ch. 5-7, 16 février 2012, Philips France e.a.

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. on second reference after cassation, against Cons. conc., dec. no.05-D-66 of 5 December

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Authors

  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
    France 386 contributions 446292 visits
  • Ashurst (Paris)
    France 103 contributions 52774 visits

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Simon Naudin, Loyalty of proof: The Paris Court of Appeal considers phone recordings to be illegal evidence in the TVHA case and refers the case back to the French NCA for further investigations after ruling that the time limit of ten years is not applicable (Philips France), 16 February 2012, Concurrences N° 2-2012, Art. N° 45889, p. 146

Visites 425

All reviews