CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ARTICLE 101 TFEU – EVIDENCE OF PARTICIPATION IN THE CARTEL – CARTELS – PARENTAL LIABILITY – FINES – NEW GUIDELINES – MARKET FOR CHLOROPRENE RUBBER – MANUFACTURE OF SYNTHETIC RUBBER IN PRIMARY FORMS

Evidence of participation in the cartel – Fines: The General Court dismisses the appeals and examines specifically the elements of calculation of the fine (Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Trib. EU, 2 February 2012, Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals v Commission, Case T-83/08, "Chloroprene Rubber Market". On 2 February 2008, the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered a judgment in Case T-83/08 brought by several applicants seeking, principally, the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007)5910 final of 5 December 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38629 - Chloroprene Rubber) and, in the alternative, a reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants. As regards the subject-matter of the contested decision, reference is made to the above

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Commission - Legal Service (Brussels)

Quotation

Bruno Stromsky, Evidence of participation in the cartel – Fines: The General Court dismisses the appeals and examines specifically the elements of calculation of the fine (Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals), 2 February 2012, Concurrences N° 2-2012, Art. N° 45842, pp. 50-51

Visites 219

All reviews