CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – EUROPEAN COMPETITION NETWORK – NCA/COMMISSION’S JURISDICTION – NE BIS IN IDEM PRINCIPLE – MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION AND CONTROL APPARATUS

European competition network: The Court of Justice does not give up the criteria of the unity of the legal interest protected for the application of the ne bis in idem principle in competition cases (Toshiba Corporation)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CJEU, 14 February 2012, Toshiba Corporation and Others, Case C-17/10 Highly anticipated since the delivery of Advocate General Kokott's Opinion on 8 September 2011, the Court's judgment in this case will disappoint those who had hoped for a development in its case-law on the application of the ne bis in idem principle in competition cases and the abandonment of the condition relating to the unity of the legitimate interest protected. They may be reassured to note that the Court, in appropriately pointing out the particular circumstances of this case, has not, at least on the face of it, definitively settled the issue. The judgment also provides important

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Alexandre Lacresse, European competition network: The Court of Justice does not give up the criteria of the unity of the legal interest protected for the application of the ne bis in idem principle in competition cases (Toshiba Corporation), 14 February 2012, Concurrences N° 2-2012, Art. N° 45859, pp. 130-132

Visites 376

All reviews