Surety: The Paris Court of Appeal holds that a surety agreement is null and void on the ground that the contract which was designated in the agreement did not exist anymore the day the surety agreement was sign, the signature of a new contract implying the novation intention of the parties (FCE Bank/BNP Paribas)

Tinguely-de La Mure, Blanche

CASE COMMENT : SURETY - PAY ATTENTION TO THE NOVATION

27 Mar 2012

Surety: The Paris Court of Appeal holds that a surety agreement is null and void on the ground that the contract which was designated in the agreement did not exist anymore the day the surety agreement was sign, the signature of a new contract implying the novation intention of the parties (FCE Bank/BNP Paribas)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

Author

Blanche Tinguely-de La Mure
Canton of Vaud (Lausanne)

Switzerland 46 contributions 9766 visits

Quotation

Blanche Tinguely-de La Mure, Surety: The Paris Court of Appeal holds that a surety agreement is null and void on the ground that the contract which was designated in the agreement did not exist anymore the day the surety agreement was sign, the signature of a new contract implying the novation intention of the parties (FCE Bank/BNP Paribas), 27 March 2012, Concurrences N° 2-2012, Art. N° 48262, www.concurrences.com

Visites 89