TRENDS : SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE – PARTIES RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS – CONSEQUENCES – CONSTITUTIONAL FRENCH COURT – FOREIGN EXPERIENCES

Significant imbalance under French unfair practice law

The papers gathered in this section devoted to significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations study, not only the rule in itself from a theoretical and practical point of view and the consequences of the French Constitutional Court’s decision, but also in its links with other French texts and in consideration of foreign experiences.

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Plural approaches to significant imbalance Introduction Muriel CHAGNY Professor at the University of Versailles DANTE Laboratory 1. Dedicate a magazine file Concurrences to one of the major texts of the reform of competition law brought about by the law on the modernisation of the economy was undeniably necessary, given the considerable stakes attached, on a practical level, to Article L. 442-6-I-2° of the Commercial Code resulting from the law of 4 August 2008, and this, well beyond the distribution sector alone, which is always mentioned. 2. While the Constitutional Council, seized with a priority question of constitutionality, has just affirmed, in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Muriel Chagny, Jacqueline Riffault-Silk, Daniel Tricot, Christophe Pecnard, Significant imbalance under French unfair practice law, May 2011, Concurrences N° 2-2011, Art. N° 35534, www.concurrences.com

Visites 2303

All reviews