*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Criminal Case, February 23, 2011, DGCCRF, No. 09-87847, "Owens Illinois Sales and Distribution France". Criminal Records, 23 February 2011, Onyx Languedoc-Roussillon, No. 09-87848. Criminal Case, February 23, 2011, DGCCRF, no. 09-87849, "Saint-Gobain Emballage". The Court of Cassation handed down two series of rulings on 23 February 2011 on appeals lodged in the context of visit and seizure operations, the first two rulings recalling that the appeal in progress cannot call into question the legality of the order authorising the visit and seizure operations, which has
CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – ARTICLE L. 450-4 OF THE COMMERCIAL CODE – ORDINANCE OF 13 NOVEMBER 2008 – APPEALS AGAINST ORDINANCES AUTHORISING SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIONS – APPEALS AGAINST THE CONDUCT OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIONS – CHALLENGEABLE ACT
Search and seizure operations – Challengeable act: The Court of Cassation reminds or specifies the nature of the challengeable acts in case of an appeals against respectively the conduct and the judicial authorisation of search and seizure operations (Owens Illinois Sales and Distribution France, Onyx Languedoc-Roussillon, Saint-Gobain Emballage)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.