CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – LME ACT – ORDINANCE OF 13 NOVEMBER 2008 – APPEALS AGAINST ORDINANCES AUTHORISING SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIONS – ARTICLE 6 ECHR – RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY/FAIR TRIAL– NATURE OF THE CONTROL EXERCISED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS

Right to an effective remedy/Fair trial – Nature of the control exercised by the court of appeals: The Paris Court of Appeal exercises a minimal review of a decision authorising search and seizure operations (Cemex Bétons Sud-Est, Ready-mixed concrete in Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. on remand after cassation, against Cons. conc., dec. no. 97-D-39 of 17 June 1997 on practices implemented by various firms in the ready-mixed concrete sector in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region. The third lesson of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
  • Ashurst (Paris)

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Simon Naudin, Right to an effective remedy/Fair trial – Nature of the control exercised by the court of appeals: The Paris Court of Appeal exercises a minimal review of a decision authorising search and seizure operations (Cemex Bétons Sud-Est, Ready-mixed concrete in Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur), 27 January 2011, Concurrences N° 2-2011, Art. N° 36277, p. 193

Visites 730

All reviews