CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT – ECSC TREATY – ATTRIBUTABILITY OF THE CONDUCT OF A SUBSIDIARY TO THE PARENT COMPANY

ECSC Treaty – Accountability of the conduct: The Court of Justice approves proceedings opened post the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and wipes out the hopes arising from the conclusions of its Advocate general on the allocation of responsibilities within groups of companies (ThyssenKrupp Nirosta, ArcelorMittal Luxembourg)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CJEU, 29 March 2011, ThyssenKrupp Nirosta (formerly ThyssenKrupp Stainless) v Commission, case C-352/09 P CJEU, 29 March 2011, ArcelorMittal Luxembourg v Commission and Commission v ArcelorMittal Luxembourg, cases C-201/09 P and C-216/09 P. (See also, infra, "Procedures" column, obs. A. Lacresse) Appeals were brought before the Court of Justice concerning

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Nathalie Jalabert-Doury, ECSC Treaty – Accountability of the conduct: The Court of Justice approves proceedings opened post the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and wipes out the hopes arising from the conclusions of its Advocate general on the allocation of responsibilities within groups of companies (ThyssenKrupp Nirosta, ArcelorMittal Luxembourg), 29 March 2011, Concurrences N° 2-2011, Art. N° 35947, p. 95

Visites 855

All reviews