CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS – BID-RIGGING – COMPLEX AND CONTINUOUS INFRINGEMENT – ATTRIBUTABILITY OF THE CONDUCT OF A SUBSIDIARY TO THE PARENT COMPANY – SETTLEMENT – FINES BASIS – GROUP OF COMPANIES – ABILITY TO PAY

Bid-rigging – Accountability of the conduct: The French Competition Authority fully adopts the European case-law on the allocation of responsibility within groups of companies (Restoration of historic monuments in France)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Const. dec. no. 11-D-02 of 26 January 2011 on practices implemented in the restoration of historic monuments The Monuments Historiques decision is not just another procurement allocation decision. It is an opportunity for the Authority to clarify and even develop its practice in several respects. In this case, the Authority fined 14 firms active in the restoration of historic monuments a total of EUR 9,8 million for agreeing, during 'round tables', to

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Nathalie Jalabert-Doury, Bid-rigging – Accountability of the conduct: The French Competition Authority fully adopts the European case-law on the allocation of responsibility within groups of companies (Restoration of historic monuments in France), 26 January 2011, Concurrences N° 2-2011, Art. N° 36023, p. 106

Visites 1163

All reviews