CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ARTICLE 101 TFEU – CONTINUOUS INFRINGEMENT – ATTRIBUTABILITY OF THE CONDUCT OF A SUBSIDIARY TO THE PARENT COMPANY – FINES – EFFECTS OF A DECISION OF ANNULMENT FOR A PARENT COMPANY

Accountability of the conduct – Fines: The General Court cancels fines imposed to certain undertakings in the copper fittings sector (Viega, Legris Industries, Comap, IMI, Kaimer, FRA.BO, Tomkins, IBP, Aalberts Industries, Pegler)

GCEU, 24 March 2011, Viega v. Commission, case T-375/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, Legris Industries v. Commission, case T-376/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, Comap v. Commission, case T-377/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, IMI a.o. v. Commission, case T-378/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, Kaimer a.o. v. Commission, case T-379/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, FRA.BO v. Commission, case T-381/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, Tomkins v. Commission, case T-382/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, IBP and International Building Products France v. Commission, case T-384/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, Aalberts Industries a.o. v. Commission, case T-385/06, “Fittings” GCEU, 24 March 2011, Pegler v. Commission, case T-386/06, “Fittings” (Voir également, infra, chronique

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Accountability of the conduct – Fines: The General Court cancels fines imposed to certain undertakings in the copper fittings sector (Viega, Legris Industries, Comap, IMI, Kaimer, FRA.BO, Tomkins, IBP, Aalberts Industries, Pegler), 24 March 2011, Concurrences Review N° 2-2011, Art. N° 35960, pp. 98-100

Visites 853

All reviews