*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. THE QUESTION FOR THE REVIEWING JUDGE IN DOMESTIC LAW Thierry FOSSIER President of the "Economic Regulation" Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeal 1. Subject calls for caution... Practitioners may, as in the past, obtain legislative and regulatory readjustments that would change the approach of judges. It could also be that the Court of Cassation, which ensures the final review of the decisions of one then the other, will have many opportunities to clarify its positions in the coming months, as litigation is abundant. It could also be that the authors who had the courage to express themselves brilliantly from the introduction of the 2008 [1] texts but who,
Share on
|
|
LEGAL PRATICE : DIGITAL INQUIRIES - FRENCH COMPETITION AUTHORITY - COURT OF APPEAL - DG COMPETITION - INSPECTIONS
Inspections and digital inquiries : The point of view of the judge of control and the DG COMP*
This set of two articles is a follow-up of two studies published in previous issues of Concurrences on competition digital inquiries. The first contribution provides the point of view of the judge in charge of controlling the French Competition Authority decision; the second contribution describes the general outline of the methodology used by DG Competition to date with respect to digital evidence gathering during inspections.
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
