CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ABUSE OF ECONOMIC DEPENDANCE - CUMULATIVE EFFECTS - ABSENCE OF ABUSE

Refusal - Abuse of economic dependence: The French Competition Authority finds no abuse of economic dependence in the relationships between a large retail distributor its franchisees (Carrefour)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Aut. conc. dec. no. 10-D-08 of March 3, 2010 relating to practices implemented by Carrefour in the local general food retail sector The historic grocers' union (SEFAG), which in its complaint implicates a series of contractual practices implemented by

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Catholic University of Louvain
    Belgium 94 contributions 139305 visits

Quotation

Anne-Lise Sibony, Refusal - Abuse of economic dependence: The French Competition Authority finds no abuse of economic dependence in the relationships between a large retail distributor its franchisees (Carrefour), 3 March 2010, Concurrences N° 2-2010, Art. N° 31285, p. 84

Visites 1520

All reviews