CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

Intention to terminate part: The Versailles Court of Appeal finds that the substantial decrease in the volume of orders is not sufficient to demonstrate the intention to terminate part of the commercial relationships with the supplier (G Klein/JC Decaux)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Versailles Court of Appeal, in a ruling that was overturned, rejected the claim for compensation from the statutory auditor for the execution of the G Klein plan, made against JC Decaux, on the basis of Article L 442-6 I.5° of the French Commercial Code, due to a significant decrease in the amount of orders placed by the latter. For many years, G Klein had been

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mireille Dany, Intention to terminate part: The Versailles Court of Appeal finds that the substantial decrease in the volume of orders is not sufficient to demonstrate the intention to terminate part of the commercial relationships with the supplier (G Klein/JC Decaux), 12 November 2009, Concurrences N° 2-2010, Art. N° 31249, pp. 97-98

Visites 2241

All reviews