CASE COMMENT: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICE - SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE - BUYER POWER

Significant imbalance: The Nîmes Court of Appeal dismisses the Minister of Economy’s complaint informing on an abuse of buying power by a mass retailer (Ministre de l’économie / Carrefour)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. That's a first! On March 30, 2010, was published in BOCCRF No. 3 dated March 30, 2010 a Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Nîmes (Minister of the Economy v. SAS Carrefour) France) dated February 25, 2010 relating to restrictive practices of competition. Information taken from the DGCCRF, will now be published in BOCCRF the full text of all practice decisions of Courts of Appeal competition, i.e. in practice essentially the judgments of the Paris Court of Appeal, the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Significant imbalance: The Nîmes Court of Appeal dismisses the Minister of Economy’s complaint informing on an abuse of buying power by a mass retailer (Ministre de l’économie / Carrefour), 25 February 2010, Concurrences N° 2-2010, Art. N° 65512, “www.concurrences.com”

Visites 135

All reviews