CASE COMMENT : DISTRIBUTION - CONSUMER - ARBITRATION APPRAISAL AGREEMENT - ABUSIVE CLAUSE

Abusive clause: The French Supreme Court holds that an arbitration appraisal agreement signed between an insurer and an insured further to a dispute does not constitute a clause in a B-to-C contract (AGPM Vie)

La victime d'un accident avait signé avec son assureur un protocole d'expertise arbitrale afin de déterminer à quelle date elle pouvait être considérée en état d'invalidité totale et définitive, les parties déclarant s'en remettre à la décision de l'arbitre et renoncer à toutes

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Philippe Vanni, Abusive clause: The French Supreme Court holds that an arbitration appraisal agreement signed between an insurer and an insured further to a dispute does not constitute a clause in a B-to-C contract (AGPM Vie), 25 February 2010, Concurrences Review N° 2-2010, Art. N° 31851, www.concurrences. com.

Visites 1568

All reviews