CASE COMMENT: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - PREDATION

Predatory pricing: The Court of Cassation upholds the analysis of the Paris Court of Appeal regarding the absence of predatory pricing (GlaxoSmithkline France)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Cass. com, 17 March 2009, Minister of the Economy, No. 08-14.503, aff. "GlaxoSmithkline France". On March 14, 2007, the Competition Council had issued its first decision, which was particularly noteworthy, condemning a company for predatory pricing (cons. conc. déc. n° 07-D-09 of March 14, 2007 relating to practices implemented by the laboratory GlaxoSmithKline France, see not. obs. A.-L. Sibony, "Retour sur la méthode de qualification des prix prédateurs", RLC 2007, No. 12, p. 17 and A. Wachsmann and L. Flochel,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Anne Wachsmann, Bastien Thomas, Predatory pricing: The Court of Cassation upholds the analysis of the Paris Court of Appeal regarding the absence of predatory pricing (GlaxoSmithkline France), 17 March 2009, Concurrences N° 2-2009, Art. N° 26028, p. 117-118

Visites 3656

All reviews