CASE COMMENT : UNILATERAL PRACTICES - FRENCH LAW - MARGIN SQUEEZE

Margin squeeze : The Paris Court of Appeal upholds fines for margin squeeze in the fixed and mobile telephony markets (ETNA - France Telecom - Cegetel)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 1st ch. H, April 2, 2008, SFR and France Telecomon referral back after cassation of the judgment on Cons. conc. 04-D-48 The Paris Court of Appeal ruled once again on the conviction of France Telecom and SFR for a pricing practice described as "margin squeeze". Initially, the Competition Council had condemned these two companies, after having been referred to it by an association of fixed-line telephone network operators who complained of practices preventing them from making attractive fixed-to-mobile

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris)

Quotation

Catherine Prieto, Margin squeeze : The Paris Court of Appeal upholds fines for margin squeeze in the fixed and mobile telephony markets (ETNA - France Telecom - Cegetel), 2 April 2008, Concurrences N° 2-2008, Art. N° 16561, p. 116

Visites 4589

All reviews