CASE COMMENTS: ANTITRUST INTERNATIONAL POLICY - PRIVATE ACTION - ROBINSON - PATMAN ACT - SECONDARY LINE PRICE DISCRIMINATION

Price discrimination: The US Supreme Court reverses its interpretation on proof of discrimination in private competitive bidding situations: a retailer must show damage to competition by actual price discrimination of the manufacturers among its resellers competing to supply the same customer (Volvo Trucks/Reeder-Simco GMC)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – USA Supreme Court, January 10, 2006, Volvo Trucks North America Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC Inc, No. 04-905 In the first quarter of 2006, the United States Supreme Court, now presided over by Judge Roberts, appointed by President G.W. Bush, issued three landmark rulings in antitrust matters. These rulings give an idea of the jurisprudential trend of what has become the "Roberts Court", which can now be cited from the name of its President. This number is significant in so far as the Court limits itself to one or two antitrust judgments per year on average in the best years, or even less. These judgments concern, in all three cases, private actions in the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Frédérique Daudret-John, François Souty, Price discrimination: The US Supreme Court reverses its interpretation on proof of discrimination in private competitive bidding situations: a retailer must show damage to competition by actual price discrimination of the manufacturers among its resellers competing to supply the same customer (Volvo Trucks/Reeder-Simco GMC), 10 January 2006, Concurrences N° 2-2006, Art. N° 802, pp. 158-160

Visites 6024

All reviews