CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURE - INQUIRY - VISITS AND SEIZURES

Visit and seizures: The Court of Cassation declares inadmissible the appeal directed against the revocation of a decision to stay proceedings pending a final decision on the legality of the visits and seizures (Colas)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, January 31, 2006, Société Colas Midi-Méditérranée c/ Ministre de l'économie e. a., n° 04-20.360 By an order of 15 June 1989, the President of the Draguignan High Court authorised the DGCCRF to visit and seize at the headquarters of several companies likely to have implemented practices of collusion, when awarding public contracts for road, earthworks, pipes and sewerage works in the Var department. Following these operations, the Administration had referred the matter to the Competition Council. Following the notification of the statement of objections, one of the undertakings in question had referred the matter to the President of the Draguignan

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Valérie Michel-Amsellem, Visit and seizures: The Court of Cassation declares inadmissible the appeal directed against the revocation of a decision to stay proceedings pending a final decision on the legality of the visits and seizures (Colas), 31 January 2006, Concurrences N° 2-2006, Art. N° 786, pp. 140-141

Visites 4770

All reviews