CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - FINING GUIDELINES - LENIENCY NOTICE

Fining guidelines - Leniency: AG Geelhoed clarifies the concept of spontaneous cooperation and on the duty to answer to requests for documents (Graphite Electrodes)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.

Clarification of the concept of spontaneous cooperation and the obligation to respond to requests for access to documents

In the graphite electrodes case, commented on in this review (Concurrences , n° 1-2004, Chronique Ententes, p. 51), Advocate General Geelhoed delivered two Opinion on 19 January 2006 in the two appeals before the Court, the first brought by the European Commission (Case C-301/04P) and the second by SGL Carbon AG (Case C-308/04P). He suggests dismissing the second appeal in its entirety and upholding the first, thereby agreeing with the Commission. It should be pointed out in passing that an abridged

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.