CASE COMMENT : PROCEDURE - PRESCRIPTION - ECONOMIC PUBLIC ORDER - PARTICULAR INTEREST - UNFAIR COMPETITION

Act of prosecution : The Court of Appeal of Paris confirmed that the filing of conclusions in the context of a civil action for damages (unfair competition) is not an act of prosecution aimed at the defense of an economic order, but the defense of a particular interest, not subject to interrupt prescription (Iliad / France Telecom)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a judgment handed down on 21 March 2006, the Paris Court of Appeal, ruling on the appeal against Competition Council Decision No. 05-D-42 of the 19 July 2005 concerning practices in the telematics services relating to examination

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.