CASE COMMENT : PROCEDURE - PRESCRIPTION - ECONOMIC PUBLIC ORDER - PARTICULAR INTEREST - UNFAIR COMPETITION
Act of prosecution : The Court of Appeal of Paris confirmed that the filing of conclusions in the context of a civil action for damages (unfair competition) is not an act of prosecution aimed at the defense of an economic order, but the defense of a particular interest, not subject to interrupt prescription (Iliad / France Telecom)
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.
In a judgment handed down on 21 March 2006, the Paris Court of Appeal, ruling on the appeal against Competition Council Decision No. 05-D-42 of the 19 July 2005 concerning practices in the telematics services relating to examination
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in