CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICE - EFFECT ON INTERSTATE TRADE - ACTION FOR DAMAGES

Action for damages : Advocate General Geelhoed presents his conclusions on an action for damages by victims of an agreement (Cannito)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Advocate General Geelhoed delivered his Opinion on 26 January 2006, in which he Joined Cases C-295/04, C-296/04, C-297/04 and C-298/04 following four references for a preliminary ruling in which the Giudice di Pace di Bitonto (Italy) raises five questions on the interpretation of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty EC and more specifically concerning the arrangements for the implementation of the action for reparation by the victims of a cartel. In this case the referring court in actions for damages for breach of contract.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.