CASE COMMENT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANCE - PUBLIC UNDERTAKING - EVICTION EFFECT

Abuse of dominance: The Competition Council rejects allegations of abuse of dominance directed against a public undertaking (CHANED/CNED)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Conseil de la concurrence, 12 décembre 2005, n° 05-D-68, relative à despratiques du Centre national d’enseignement à distance

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Competition Council has posted online Decision No. 05-D-68 of 12 December 2005 on practices of the National Centre for Distance Education. In this case, the Competition Council had been referred by the Chamber of Commerce to the national union of private distance education (CHANED) of various alleged abuse of dominance by the head of the National Centre (CNED) resulting from discriminatory advantages related to its position as a public

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.