CASE COMMENT - DISTRIBUTION - FRANCHISE - NON-RENEWAL OF CONTRACT - OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION

Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal rules on the indemnity of non-renewal of franchise contract (Soixante / ADA)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Paris Court of Appeal, 5th Chamber, Section A, 12 January 2005,SARL Soixante v SA ADA Facts ADA, which operates a network of car rental agencies, had entered into a fixed-term franchise agreement with a distributor. As the contract was about to expire, ADA did not wish to renew it. The distributor, Société Soixante, then sued its former franchisor for payment of damages corresponding, in particular, to the loss in value of the business carried on and the loss in value of the commercial and advertising investments

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Montpellier

Quotation

Didier Ferrier, Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal rules on the indemnity of non-renewal of franchise contract (Soixante / ADA), 12 January 2005, Concurrences N° 2-2005, Art. N° 27714, www.concurrences.com

Visites 2096

All reviews