CASE COMMENT: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES

Price difference : The Versailles Court of Appeal considers that price difference must be justified (Parashop/La Roche Posay)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CA Versailles, 27 January 2005, S.A. Parashop Diffusion v/ S.A. La Roche Posay Laboratoire Pharmaceutique and S.N.C Cosmétique Active France The Versailles Court of Appeals, in a decision of January 27, 2005, recalled the conditions for the application of Article L. 442-6 I 1° of the French Commercial Code, when assessing a scale of discounts established in the distribution of parapharmaceutical products. In this case, Parashop Diffusion SA, a

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.