CASE COMMENT: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES
Price difference : The Versailles Court of Appeal considers that price difference must be justified (Parashop/La Roche Posay)
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.
– CA Versailles, 27 January 2005, S.A. Parashop Diffusion v/ S.A. La Roche Posay Laboratoire Pharmaceutique and S.N.C Cosmétique Active France
The Versailles Court of Appeals, in a decision of January 27, 2005, recalled the conditions for the application of Article L. 442-6 I 1° of the French Commercial Code, when assessing a scale of discounts established in the distribution of parapharmaceutical products. In this case, Parashop Diffusion SA, a
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in