CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - EUROPEAN LAW - LITIGATION - THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN A CASE - RIGHT TO INTERVENE - CONDITION - INTEREST IN THE RESULT OF THE CASE

Right to intervene: The CFI gives a few precisions concerning the right to intervene open to representative associations, on the one hand, and to individual firms, on the other hand (Microsoft)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI (ord.), pres. 4th ed, 9 March 2005, Microsoft v. Commission, Case T-201/04 By order of 9 March 2005, the CFI granted nine applications to intervene in the Microsoft case. The main point of that order is the manner in which the right to intervene conferred on representative associations and the right to intervene conferred on other natural or legal persons are articulated. While the condition to which the procedural rules make the right to intervene subject is a single one (the applicant

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Fabien Zivy, Right to intervene: The CFI gives a few precisions concerning the right to intervene open to representative associations, on the one hand, and to individual firms, on the other hand (Microsoft), 9 March 2005, Concurrences N° 2-2005, Art. N° 1296, pp. 89-90

Visites 3866

All reviews