Right to intervene: The CFI holds that a third party intervener is barred from seeking a form of order other than the ones sought by the party he supports (Piau - Sniace)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 26 January 2005, Piau v. Commission, Case T-193/02 – CFI, 14 April 2005, Sniace v. Commission, Case T-88/01 Two judgments of the CFI apply the rule that the object of the intervention is to support the conclusions of one of the main parties (Article 40(4) of the Statute of the ECJ), so that the conclusions of the intervener can only support the latter (Article 116(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the CFI). It is clear from this rule that the intervener is not entitled to find that the action is inadmissible where the defendant merely