Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal ruled that article 1171 C. civ. should not be excluded in favor of the former article L. 442-6, I, 5° C. com. (Société commerciale de télécommunication / Entreprise de construction Duarte)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The question of the relationship between the texts of the Civil Code and the Commercial Code relating to significant imbalance is not yet settled, and it is always with interest that one welcomes the judgments rendered by the judges of the merits, even if they are summarily motivated, which evoke this delicate subject (see already CA Lyon, CA Lyon, 3rd ch A, 27 Feb 2020, n° 18/08265; and more generally F. Buy, "L'article 1171, un texte pour le droit de affaires", in Mél. already CA Lyon, CA Lyon, 3e ch. A, 27 Feb. 2020, n° 18/08265; and more generally F. Buy, "L'article 1171, un texte pour le droit

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Aix-Marseille

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal ruled that article 1171 C. civ. should not be excluded in favor of the former article L. 442-6, I, 5° C. com. (Société commerciale de télécommunication / Entreprise de construction Duarte), 5 November 2021, Concurrences N° 1-2022, Art. N° 105444, pp. 116-117

Visites 72

All reviews