Applicable law: The French Supreme Court rules out the application of the former article L. 442-6, I, 5° C. com. to the relationship between an industrial property attorney and his clients (Brandstorming / Yves Saint-Laurent, Balanciaga, Yves Saint-Laurent parfum, Kering)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The former article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code remains a particularly lively source of litigation. One of the causes of this litigation is undoubtedly the delimitation of the field of application of the sanction mechanism for the brutal rupture of established commercial relations. Indeed, beyond the difficulties caused by the terminology used by the legislator, it must be noted that the former article L. 442-6, I, 5° of the Commercial Code is the site of contrary movements. The flexibility found at one time in one place of the text (the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Applicable law: The French Supreme Court rules out the application of the former article L. 442-6, I, 5° C. com. to the relationship between an industrial property attorney and his clients (Brandstorming / Yves Saint-Laurent, Balanciaga, Yves Saint-Laurent parfum, Kering), 1 December 2021, Concurrences N° 1-2022, Art. N° 105438, pp. 118-119

Visites 86

All reviews