*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Puma designs and produces sports and leisure articles, marketed under the eponymous brand name through a selective distribution network. It sued Lidl, a company which, without being part of that network, had sold shoes and backpacks under the Puma brand as part of a promotional
CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION - SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION - OFF-GRID RESALE - UNFAIR COMPETITION - FREE-RIDING
Selective distribution: The French Civil Supreme Court recalls the criteria for characterising unfair or parasitic competition when a distributor markets products in disregard of a selective distribution system (Puma / Lidl)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.