CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - SUDDEN TERMINATION - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION - POLICE LAW

Mandatory rules: The Paris Court of Appel rules again that the provisions of the former article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code do not constitute mandatory rules (H.D / Cranes France)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Paris Court of Appeal, Oct. 8th, 2020, H.D vs. Cranes France, RG n° 17/19893

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Paris Court of Appeal enters in resistance. While the Court of Cassation now considers that the provisions of former

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Aix-Marseille
    France 66 contributions 27347 visits

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Mandatory rules: The Paris Court of Appel rules again that the provisions of the former article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code do not constitute mandatory rules (H.D / Cranes France), 8 October 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99152, p. 158

Visites 223

All reviews