CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE - REMEDY

Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal finds that end of year rebates based on pre-sales are unbalanced after rejecting a claim based on an alleged abuse of economic dependence (Isocalor / Dalkia)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Since 2006, Dalkia has had a commercial relationship with Isocalor Energie, a company specialising in HVAC engineering and thermal insulation. In 2017, revenue was reduced and Isocalor brought an action against Dalkia for abusively exploiting a situation of economic dependence, partially severing the commercial relationship and imposing unbalanced end-of-year discount

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal finds that end of year rebates based on pre-sales are unbalanced after rejecting a claim based on an alleged abuse of economic dependence (Isocalor / Dalkia), 25 November 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99153, pp. 153-154

Visites 150

All reviews