CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION - SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION - OFF-GRID RESALE - UNFAIR COMPETITION - FREE-RIDING

Selective distribution: The French Civil Supreme Court recalls the criteria for characterising unfair or parasitic competition when a distributor markets products in disregard of a selective distribution system (Puma / Lidl)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Puma designs and produces sports and leisure articles, marketed under the eponymous brand name through a selective distribution network. It sued Lidl, a company which, without being part of that network, had sold shoes and backpacks under the Puma brand as part of a promotional

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Nicolas Éréséo, Selective distribution: The French Civil Supreme Court recalls the criteria for characterising unfair or parasitic competition when a distributor markets products in disregard of a selective distribution system (Puma / Lidl), 18 November 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99138, p. 146

Visites 36

All reviews