CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - FRANCE - ABUSE OF EXCLUSION - PRICE SQUEEZE

Price squeeze: The French Supreme Court overturns a decision of the Paris Court of Appeal for failing to examine the impact of the victim’s conduct on the classification as an abuse of the company’s conduct while in a dominant position (SFR / Orange)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a judgment dated February 12, 2014, the Commercial Court ordered the company Orange ["Orange"] to pay damages of 51.38 million euros to the company SFR ["SFR"] for having abused its dominant position. In this case, whose facts date back to the early 2010's, Orange offered its customers a so-called "Second Home" offer which gave the occupant of a second home the possibility of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Anne Wachsmann, Nicolas Zacharie, Price squeeze: The French Supreme Court overturns a decision of the Paris Court of Appeal for failing to examine the impact of the victim’s conduct on the classification as an abuse of the company’s conduct while in a dominant position (SFR / Orange), 16 September 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99128, pp. 135-136

Visites 93

All reviews