CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES - FRANCE - DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES - INTERIM MEASURES - BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY - JURISDICTION

Jurisdiction: The French Court of Jurisdictional Conflict rules that the Paris Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to rule on a decision of the French Competition Authority to publish a decision disclosing business secrets in spite of a classification decision of the General Rapporteur (Google)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The period under review brings its new episode relating to the issue of the treatment of business secrecy before the Competition Authority (for a reminder of previous episodes, v. not. Christophe Lemaire, Adèle Azzi, Le Conseil d'État décline sa compétence pour traiter d'un recours contre une décision du Collège de l'Autorité de la concurrence d'inclure dans une décision de mesures conservatoires des informations auxquelles le Rapporteur Général avait accordé la protection au titre du secret des affaires (Google), 20 mars 2020, Concurrences N° 2-2020, Art. n° 94900, pp. 164-167). It will be recalled that, following a complaint byAmadeus, an operator of a directory

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Alexandre Marescaux, Jurisdiction: The French Court of Jurisdictional Conflict rules that the Paris Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to rule on a decision of the French Competition Authority to publish a decision disclosing business secrets in spite of a classification decision of the General Rapporteur (Google), 5 October 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99211, pp. 185-188

Visites 43

All reviews