CASE COMMENTS: INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW – ABUSE OF A DOMINANT POSITION – PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT – EVIDENCE – NULLITY

Italy: The Court of Milan rules on the extent of the evidentiary value of the decision of the Competition Authority and the civil consequences (Compass Banca)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. By a judgment of 2 December 2020, published 5 days later, the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio ["TAR Lazio"] rejected the appeal filed by a banking institution against the decision of the Competition and Market Authority ["AGCM"] or ["Competition Authority"] which, with a view to civil litigation, had authorised access to certain documents in the file which led, on 27 November 2019, to a conviction of the banking establishment for unfair commercial practice in connection with the conclusion of certain financing contracts (for the record, the Italian Competition Authority also has jurisdiction in matters of unfair commercial practices implemented

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Silvia Pietrini, Italy: The Court of Milan rules on the extent of the evidentiary value of the decision of the Competition Authority and the civil consequences (Compass Banca), 2 December 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99219, pp. 230-231

Visites 95

All reviews