CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - FRANCE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES - NEIGHBOURING RIGHTS

Discrimination: The Paris Court of Appeal upholds essential part of the decision requiring a search engine to negotiate with press publishers as interim measures (Google / SPEM)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. It will be recalled that in a decision dated April 9, 2019, the Competition Authority had issued protective measures against Google in the context of a potential abuse of a dominant position (see our previous column, Discrimination : The French Competition Authority orders protective measures in favour of press agencies and publishers against a company that may have abused its dominant position on the French market for general search services(Google/Syndicat des éditeurs de la presse magazine, Alliance de la presse d'information générale and Agence France-Presse), 9 April 2020, Concurrences No. 3-2020, Art. No. 96039, pp. 101-103). The decision is essentially

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Marie Cartapanis, Discrimination: The Paris Court of Appeal upholds essential part of the decision requiring a search engine to negotiate with press publishers as interim measures (Google / SPEM), 8 October 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 99136, pp. 138-140

Visites 36

All reviews