ALERTS: PROCEDURES - FRANCE - CHEMICAL COMMODITIES - PRIORITY QUESTION ON CONSTITUTIONALITY - SANCTIONS - OBSTRUCTION PRACTICES

Priority question on constitutionality: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects a request for judicial review on the conformity of the second paragraph of Article L. 464-2, V, C. Com., which was already referred to the French Supreme Court in a similar case (Brenntag)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. It will be remembered that on 26 October 2020, the Court of Cassation was seized of a priority constitutionality issue https://lactu-concurrence.us14.list... relating to the compliance of Article L. 464-2 of the French Commercial Code and, more specifically, the provisions of the second paragraph of V of the said article, which allow the Competition Authority, when the company has obstructed the investigation or inquiry, to impose a financial penalty of up to 1% of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Priority question on constitutionality: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects a request for judicial review on the conformity of the second paragraph of Article L. 464-2, V, C. Com., which was already referred to the French Supreme Court in a similar case (Brenntag), 17 December 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 98656, www.concurrences.com

Visites 121

All reviews